Re: performance of insert/delete/update

From: Wei Weng <wweng(at)kencast(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: performance of insert/delete/update
Date: 2002-11-21 22:23:57
Message-ID: 1037917437.5930.7.camel@Monet
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 16:23, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Wei,
>
> > There had been a great deal of discussion of how to improve the
> > performance of select/sorting on this list, what about
> > insert/delete/update?
> >
> > Is there any rules of thumb we need to follow? What are the
> > parameters
> > we should tweak to whip the horse to go faster?
>
> yes, lots of rules. Wanna be more specific? You wondering about
> query structure, hardware, memory config, what?
I am most concerned about the software side, that is query structures
and postgresql config.

Thanks

--
Wei Weng
Network Software Engineer
KenCast Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2002-11-21 22:26:40 Re: performance of insert/delete/update
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-11-21 21:59:53 Re: Optimizer & boolean syntax

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2002-11-21 22:26:40 Re: performance of insert/delete/update
Previous Message Bjoern Metzdorf 2002-11-21 21:57:59 Re: [ADMIN] H/W RAID 5 on slower disks versus no raid on