| From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: backhanded compliment from Larry Ellison | 
| Date: | 2002-11-20 18:53:23 | 
| Message-ID: | 1037818403.23925.95.camel@camel | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy | 
On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 12:16, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Robert,
> 
> > He was then quoted as saying "They are a bigger threat to [Microsoft]
> > SQL Server than Oracle." 
> 
> I've always felt the same.  In fact, I tried to persuade the president
> of Great Bridge to target SQL Server before taking on Oracle, without
> success.
> 
I don't think you can really take on microsoft until you have native
windows support. For the few commercial companies that have a native
postgresql solution now, they should be marketing that like crazy. 
<snip>
> 
> Also, keep in mind that 80% of MS SQL server purchases are an included
> part of vertical applications ... that is, people are not buying MS SQL
> Server, they are buying ELBS or Great Plains Accounting.   These
> purchases we will not influence until we can get similar commercial
> vertical apps to adopt postgresql.
> 
yep, but I think our lack of a native windows version has kept a lot of
these companies from adopting us more so than anything else. 
 
> This is a good opportunity -- MS SQL Server is weak and not getting
> better, and MS's acquisition of Great Plains was a dismal failure --
> financial software is sold on support, and MS support sucks -- so we
> could pick up and entire industry segment if we make the right
> alliances.
> 
Robert Treat
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jason Hihn | 2002-11-20 19:31:06 | Re: Creating a framework for the Advocacy and | 
| Previous Message | Jason Hihn | 2002-11-20 18:52:57 | Re: backhanded compliment from Larry Ellison |