Re: Apple's ranlib warns about protocol_openssl.c

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Apple's ranlib warns about protocol_openssl.c
Date: 2021-12-16 18:22:34
Message-ID: 1037477.1639678954@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 4:48 AM Peter Eisentraut
> <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> These are not errors, right? So why is this a problem?

> Yeah they're just warnings. I don't personally care if we just ignore
> them until we drop OpenSSL < 1.1.0 or macOS < 10.something. I
> mentioned it because in the past we worked to get rid of these sorts
> of warnings (there have been a couple of rounds at least), and they
> show up more obviously in the CI scripts because they use -s, so the 3
> warning lines are the only output.

Yeah, "zero chatter from a successful build" has been a goal
for awhile now.

Having said that, I'm not seeing any such warning when I build
with openssl 1.1.1k on my own Mac, so I'm a bit confused why
Thomas sees it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua Brindle 2021-12-16 18:31:58 Re: Granting SET and ALTER SYSTE privileges for GUCs
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-12-16 18:08:46 Re: Confused comment about drop replica identity index