Re: Low Budget Performance

From: Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Low Budget Performance
Date: 2002-10-29 21:09:41
Message-ID: 1035925781.11600.42.camel@haggis
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 11:31, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:10:31AM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >
> > Out of curiousity, what is it with RAID 5? I've encountered the poor
> > write performance too ... any idea why?
>
> It largely depends on the controller and te implementation. It has
> to do with the cost of calculating the checksum. If the
> implementation of that is inefficient, the writes become inefficient.

A high-quality smart controller with lots of cache RAM definitely
negates the RAID5 performance issues.

(Of course, I'm referring to enterprise-level rack-mounted h/w
that costs big bucks...)

--
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ron Johnson, Jr. mailto:ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net |
| Jefferson, LA USA http://members.cox.net/ron.l.johnson |
| |
| "they love our milk and honey, but preach about another |
| way of living" |
| Merle Haggard, "The Fighting Side Of Me" |
+------------------------------------------------------------+

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert J. Sanford, Jr. 2002-10-29 21:57:29 Re: Low Budget Performance
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2002-10-29 20:13:41 Re: Low Budget Performance