Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?

From: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Giles Lean <giles(at)nemeton(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
Date: 2002-10-22 01:50:07
Message-ID: 1035251408.1490.0.camel@lerlaptop.lerctr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2002-10-21 at 20:47, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Here is a modified version of Philip's patch that has the changes Tom
> suggested; treating off_t as an integral type. I did light testing on
> my BSD/OS machine that has 8-byte off_t but I don't have 4 gigs of free
> space to test larger files.
I can make an account for anyone that wants to play on UnixWare 7.1.3.

--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-10-22 01:52:13 Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-10-22 01:47:37 Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?