| From: | Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mike Benoit <mikeb(at)netnation(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Performance while loading data and indexing |
| Date: | 2002-10-03 23:35:34 |
| Message-ID: | 1033688135.13005.28.camel@mouse.copelandconsulting.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Hey, excellent. Thanks!
Based on that, it appears that XFS is a pretty good FS to use. For me,
the real surprise was how well reiserfs performed.
Greg
On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 18:09, Mike Benoit wrote:
> Some of you may be interested in this seemingly exhaustive benchmark
> between ext2/3, ReiserFS, JFS, and XFS.
>
> http://www.osdl.org/presentations/lwe-jgfs.pdf
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2002-10-03 23:50:23 | v7.2.3 Released to fix Potentially Critical Bug |
| Previous Message | Mike Benoit | 2002-10-03 23:09:56 | Re: [GENERAL] Performance while loading data and indexing |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Philip Warner | 2002-10-03 23:42:35 | Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-10-03 23:17:24 | Re: Potential Large Performance Gain in WAL synching |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-10-03 23:59:56 | Re: [GENERAL] Performance while loading data and indexing |
| Previous Message | Mike Benoit | 2002-10-03 23:09:56 | Re: [GENERAL] Performance while loading data and indexing |