| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~? |
| Date: | 2024-04-03 15:29:35 |
| Message-ID: | 103258.1712158175@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> As far as I can tell, no versions of LibreSSL so far provide
> X509_get_signature_info(), so this patch is probably a bit too
> aggressive.
Another problem with cutting support is how many buildfarm members
will we lose. I scraped recent configure logs and got the attached
results. I count 3 machines running 1.0.1, 18 running some flavor
of 1.0.2, and 7 running various LibreSSL versions. We could
probably retire or update the 1.0.1 installations, but the rest
would represent a heavier lift. Notably, it seems that what macOS
is shipping is LibreSSL.
regards, tom lane
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| opensslversions | text/plain | 8.8 KB |
| opensslmeson | text/plain | 1.4 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Panda Developpeur | 2024-04-03 15:49:41 | Re: [PATCH] Modify pg_ctl to detect presence of geek user |
| Previous Message | Tristan Partin | 2024-04-03 15:16:58 | Re: psql not responding to SIGINT upon db reconnection |