Re: 7.2.2 bug?

From: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.2.2 bug?
Date: 2002-09-03 21:16:28
Message-ID: 1031087789.43658.69.camel@jester
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2002-09-03 at 16:42, Tom Lane wrote:
> Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca> writes:
> > DEBUG: server process (pid 9097) was terminated by signal 10
>
> Could we have a backtrace from that core dump?
>
> AFAICT it's getting through the WAL redo just fine, so the problem
> is (probably) not what you think.

Took me a while, but I eventually figured out that they changed the
NAMEDATALEN in the old version, and didn't match it in the new one.

So the error is exactly what is expected -- memory allocation errors.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-09-03 21:19:24 Re: 7.2.2 bug?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-09-03 20:42:49 Re: 7.2.2 bug?