| From: | Thomas O'Dowd <tom(at)nooper(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Jean-Christian Imbeault <jc(at)mega-bucks(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG?: timestamp without TZ created as timestamp |
| Date: | 2002-08-29 14:51:57 |
| Message-ID: | 1030632717.7732.43.camel@beast.uwillsee.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi Tom,
On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 22:56, Tom Lane wrote:
> That is the behavior in 7.2; it's a transient state to help people
> migrate from our old not-very-SQL-compliant datatype names.
>
> In 7.3 "timestamp" will mean "timestamp without time zone" per spec.
Just looking at the 7.3 docs... Is this right? Have the docs been
updated yet?
http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/datatype-datetime.html
timestamp [ (p) ] without time zone
timestamp [ (p) ] [ with time zone ]
which implies to me that "timestamp" means "timestamp with time zone"???
Its also quite late here and I'm a bit star-eye'd so maybe I've got it
all wrong.
Thanks,
Tom.
--
Thomas O'Dowd. - Nooping - http://nooper.com
tom(at)nooper(dot)com - Testing - http://nooper.co.jp/labs
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-08-29 15:01:07 | Re: BUG?: timestamp without TZ created as timestamp *with* TZ |
| Previous Message | Ralph Graulich | 2002-08-29 14:49:52 | Compiling 7.2.1 with JDBC-Support fails - help needed |