Re: Performance Tuning / RAM Usage

From: Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance Tuning / RAM Usage
Date: 2002-08-28 15:23:23
Message-ID: 1030548203.22473.125.camel@linda
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 15:55, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 10:40:46AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> writes:
> > > I know that the Debian package does not -- or at least didn't used to
> > > -- check for deadlocks at all,
> >
> > [blinks] What?
>
> Hmm. I just checked my home box (where I have the Debian package
> installed), and it seems no longer to be the case. There's no entry
> for deadlock_timeout, so the default (1000, IIRC) is what gets used,
> I guess. I have a dim memory, however, of a comment in the old
> config file to the effect that the (Debian) default setting of
> deadlock_timeout was infinite, i.e. effectively no deadlock checking.
>
> Hmm. I just checked an ancient box with 6.5 on it, and it's not
> there. Maybe I'm on crack.

I fear so :-)

I'm sure I've never made any such change to the package.

--
Oliver Elphick Oliver(dot)Elphick(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk
Isle of Wight, UK
http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
========================================
"Use hospitality one to another without grudging."
I Peter 4:9

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2002-08-28 16:02:22 Re: worried about PGPASSWORD drop
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2002-08-28 15:20:30 Re: stupid Q regarding "UPDATE waiting"