Re: tracking down idle transactions in pg_locks

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Gardner <david(at)gardnerit(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: tracking down idle transactions in pg_locks
Date: 2008-07-18 05:14:42
Message-ID: 10303.1216358082@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

David Gardner <david(at)gardnerit(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> The most common cause of this problem is apps that issue "COMMIT; BEGIN"
>> and then go to sleep. If that's what this app is doing (if you don't
>> know, turn on statement logging and find out...) then updating to a more
>> recent PG version might help. In 8.3 a transaction doesn't block VACUUM's
>> row reclamation until it's done something more than just BEGIN.

> W are running 8.3, I have been able to reproduce the problem, it
> occurs after an insert has occurred.

Oh ... well that's just bad design :-(. If the app goes to sleep with
an uncommitted insert then it's capable of blocking other transactions,
quite independently of VACUUM. For instance, an attempt to insert a
conflicting unique-key value would have to block.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ridvan Lakas ng Bayan S. Baluyos 2008-07-21 01:30:34 Re: Stopping a transaction as soon as an error occurs
Previous Message David Gardner 2008-07-18 05:06:26 Re: tracking down idle transactions in pg_locks