Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
Date: 2015-08-05 14:32:48
Message-ID: 10278.1438785168@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> Wasn't the point that 32 bit AIX as a whole hasn't been supported for a
> couple years now? My willingness to expend effort for that is rather
> limited.

Well, there's one in the buildfarm. We don't generally turn off
buildfarm critters just because the underlying OS is out of support
(the population would be quite a bit lower if we did).

> I mean I'd otherwise ok with a PG_FORCE_DISABLE_INLINE flag that takes
> effect in c.h or so. That could easily be set in src/template/aix. Might
> also be useful for investigatory purposes every couple years or so.

+1, that could have other use-cases.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-08-05 14:48:31 Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
Previous Message Andres Freund 2015-08-05 14:29:12 Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6