Re: small psql patch - show Schema name for \dt \dv \dS

From: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>
To: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: small psql patch - show Schema name for \dt \dv \dS
Date: 2002-07-25 01:24:08
Message-ID: 1027560260.55417.25.camel@jester
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Perhaps current_schemas would be easier to use if it was changed to
return one schema per row returned? Need a little uglyness around it
until attributes are re-worked.

On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 21:23, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> > It's done that for some time. However, "nsp in current_schemas" isn't
> > going to solve psql's problem anyway, since it ignores the fundamental
> > issue of visibility: just because an object is in your search path does
> > not mean you can see it. It might be masked by a similarly-named object
> > earlier in the path.
>
> I think that can be solved by doing an ORDER BY the current_schemas()
> results and a LIMIT 1. The bigger problem is the above-mentioned 'nsp in
> current_schemas'. I cannot think of an easy way to do this. In other
> words, the equivalent of "select * from pg_class where relnamespace
> in (current_schemas())" Is there a function in the core to check
> an array? The *= construct in contrib/array would be nice, but it
> cannot be used to compile psql. My other options are to create a
> function, create some internal SQL calls, or do some really ugly
> C parsing of the results of "select current_schemas(true)." I
> am leaning towards the latter, but a nice internal function that
> breaks an array into a table would be great.
>
> Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
> PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200207242119
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html
>
> iD8DBQE9P1LJvJuQZxSWSsgRAoG3AJ9Daapv2Hixx0JwE3s6Fn2v9sqU+QCghSpc
> gPhA2xG2bRH1kXhgnLSm58Y=
> =0s2B
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2002-07-25 02:14:28 Re: Proposal: anonymous composite types for Table Functions (aka SRFs)
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2002-07-25 01:23:09 Re: small psql patch - show Schema name for \dt \dv \dS