Re: pg_settings.enumval as array

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_settings.enumval as array
Date: 2008-11-21 18:20:39
Message-ID: 10271.1227291639@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Also, the output datatype should be text[] not cstring[].

> Ok, will change. That requires hardcode of 1009? Or should I a #define
> to pg_type.h?

Add a #define (bit surprising we didn't have one already)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2008-11-21 18:36:27 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Silence compiler warning about ignored return value.
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2008-11-21 18:10:15 Re: pg_settings.enumval as array