Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?
Date: 2020-11-19 06:23:39
Message-ID: 1026689.1605767019@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> So my vote would be to rip it out, not document it. Somebody can try
> again in future, perhaps. But if we document it we're just locking
> ourselves into a SQL incompatibility.

Apparently, somebody already had that thought. See func.sgml
lines 765-782, which were commented out by 8272fc3f7.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2020-11-19 06:47:51 Re: don't allocate HashAgg hash tables when running explain only
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2020-11-19 06:23:05 Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries