Re: Current initdb broken.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Keith Parks <emkxp01(at)mtcc(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk>, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Current initdb broken.
Date: 2000-06-12 16:07:14
Message-ID: 1026.960826034@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> I'm not sure, that would break the basic line of error checking in COPY.

> It would be active only for pg_shadow and no other table. However, I
> see that having not enough column in COPY fills the rest with NULL and
> does not report an error.

I believe that's a bug in COPY, actually: it should complain if you
don't supply the right number of columns.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-06-12 16:14:53 Re: FORMAL VOTE ON =- and similar
Previous Message Bruce Momjian - CVS 2000-06-12 16:05:26 pgsql (Makefile)