Re: Portability concerns over pq_sendbyte?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Portability concerns over pq_sendbyte?
Date: 2018-06-14 20:17:28
Message-ID: 10238.1529007448@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> How about not renaming the functions, but just change argument types?

Yeah, I didn't understand why anything else would be on the table.
We already changed their arg types for 11, no? This is just second
thoughts about what to change them to.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-06-14 20:23:06 Re: Shared access methods?
Previous Message Bossart, Nathan 2018-06-14 20:14:54 Re: Microoptimization of Bitmapset usage in postgres_fdw