| From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Future plans |
| Date: | 2002-05-21 12:00:22 |
| Message-ID: | 1021982422.17080.4.camel@taru.tm.ee |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2002-05-21 at 10:18, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 12:35:20AM +0500, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> > > - recursive views (you know, I wanted to implement this when I started
> > > my work on PostgreSQL, but never found the time)
> >
> > A good start would be to make the parser recognize the full sql99 syntax
> > for it. Its quite big - see attached gif I generated from grammar
> > extracted from the standard:
>
> Well, the parser seems to be the easier part. :-)
Sure.
My point was that we should put in the _full_ syntax in one shot and
then we could implement in smaller pieces.
------------------
Hannu
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-05-21 13:17:29 | Re: More schema queries |
| Previous Message | Manfred Koizar | 2002-05-21 10:54:10 | Re: Per tuple overhead, cmin, cmax, OID |