Patches I'm thinking of pushing shortly

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Patches I'm thinking of pushing shortly
Date: 2017-08-11 15:24:37
Message-ID: 10208.1502465077@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I have some patches sitting around in my workspace that I think are
non-controversial, and so I was considering just pushing them once
the tree opens for v11 development. If anyone thinks they need
further review, I'll put them into the September commitfest, but
otherwise we might as well skip the overhead. These are:

1. check-hash-bucket-size-against-work_mem-2.patch from
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/13698.1487283211@sss.pgh.pa.us

That discussion sort of trailed off, but there wasn't really anyone
saying not to commit it, and no new ideas have surfaced.

2. simplify-simple-expresssion-checking.patch from
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2257.1498412915@sss.pgh.pa.us

This is the patch to get rid of plpgsql's exec_simple_check_node()
as Robert suggested. It's never been anything but a maintenance
nuisance.

3. remove-pgbench-option-ordering-constraint.patch from
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20559.1501703105@sss.pgh.pa.us

That one was already informally reviewed by two people, so I don't
think it needs another look.

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adam, Etienne (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux) 2017-08-11 15:33:22 [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-08-11 15:14:44 Re: POC: Sharing record typmods between backends