| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1 |
| Date: | 2005-12-03 00:43:24 |
| Message-ID: | 10201.1133570604@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>> (The larger point that joins of inheritance unions aren't well-planned
>> is true, but it's always been true...)
> It also seems to have a probkem with unions in views.
> Is there anything that can be done about this -- workarounds etc? Any
> plans to address it? We've got a couple of places where it's beginning
> to bite us due to growth of tables.
It's something that's on the ever-growing TODO list ... I dunno if
anyone has any near-term plans to work on it. It'd definitely be
nice to teach the planner to do joins-over-unions well, and then
make inheritance just invoke that behavior instead of being a crocky
special case.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-03 00:47:15 | Re: strange behavior (corruption?) of large production database |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2005-12-03 00:40:47 | Re: strange behavior (corruption?) of large production |