From: | Mark kirkwood <markir(at)slingshot(dot)co(dot)nz> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re : Solaris Performance - Profiling |
Date: | 2002-04-09 08:37:12 |
Message-ID: | 1018341433.1289.25.camel@spikey.slithery.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I have an update on this.
I thought I should at least attempt to bother the Sun support
organisation about this poor state of affairs, i.e - a 7 year known
performance problem with their qsort.
I got the response I am used to getting from commercial support
organisations :-(
(paraphrase)
"yep it performs poorly, but we dont think its going to be changed in
the near future..."
I decided that enough was enough and mailed scott(dot)mcnealy(at)sun(dot)com with
what I thought was a reasonable summary of the situation.
I recieved (with some surprise I must say) a message from
Graham Lovell<graham(at)jurassic(dot)eng(dot)sun(dot)com> (Solaris Software Marketing)
to the effect that Sun taking the feedback on board and would modify the
qsort library (bugfix #4489885 for those of you who know who to track
these...I dont - but wouldnt mind knowing...) making patches available
for Solaris 2.6 -> 2.9 in about 4 weeks or so.
I'll keep you posted ...
regards in (pleasant) surprise
Mark
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Markus Orlich | 2002-04-09 09:07:04 | [General] How could it work? |
Previous Message | Jean-Michel POURE | 2002-04-09 06:32:23 | Re: Porting from MySql - meta data issues |