From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Some 8.4 changes needed according to pg_migrator testing |
Date: | 2009-05-08 15:19:54 |
Message-ID: | 1018.1241795994@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> On Thursday 07 May 2009 20:54:37 Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> I don't think there's much we can do apart from telling the user not to
>> move stuff across platforms that do not have equally named locales.
> The other part of the problem is that there is no guarantee that equally or
> similarly named locales behave the same. There will necessarily be a user-
> beware factor here, and perhaps blowing up when the locale name is not
> recognized is safer and alerts about this fact better than trying to make it
> match by force somehow.
We have never before operated on the assumption that it's okay for
pg_dump output to be locked to particular platforms, and I do not think
we should start now. So we've got to do *something* about this.
(Do you really want PG Windows users to be unable to port to a better
platform?)
I note also that the problem is in pg_dumpall not pg_dump, so pg_restore
is not going to help us --- if someone has a problem his only recourse
would be manual editing of a possibly-monstrous SQL script file.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-05-08 15:30:57 | Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking |
Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2009-05-08 15:15:10 | Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking |