Re: pg_migrator issues

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_migrator issues
Date: 2010-01-05 15:53:15
Message-ID: 10177.1262706795@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> I liked the idea, but I listed it as item #2 and no one else said they
> liked it. The only complexity I can see with the idea is that doing an
> upgrade from one alpha to another would have the same major version
> number and would therefore not be possible, so maybe we have to use the
> catalog version number in there.

Good point. Using catversion for the purpose seems a bit ugly but
I have no better ideas.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-01-05 15:54:08 Re: FM format modifier does not remove leading zero from year
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-01-05 15:47:33 We no longer have a fallback for machines without working int64