| From: | Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: compile bug in HEAD? |
| Date: | 2002-03-27 23:53:53 |
| Message-ID: | 1017273233.8890.20.camel@jiro |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2002-03-27 at 11:06, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> If someone is really bored out of their mind, at least one of these
> warnings can be gotten rid of by not using the -l option to flex. That
> might be desirable for other reasons, too, one of which is improved speed.
>
> No, just removing -l from the makefile is not the right fix.
I'm curious; why is this "not the right fix"? According to the manpage:
-l turns on maximum compatibility with the original
AT&T lex implementation. Note that this does not
mean full compatibility. Use of this option
costs a considerable amount of performance...
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilconway(at)rogers(dot)com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-03-28 00:56:15 | Re: compile bug in HEAD? |
| Previous Message | Nicolas Bazin | 2002-03-27 23:30:21 | Always the same ecpg bug - please (re)apply patch |