| From: | Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Lockhart <thomas(at)fourpalms(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Jeff Davis <list-pgsql-general(at)dynworks(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Notify argument? |
| Date: | 2002-03-20 17:09:16 |
| Message-ID: | 1016644156.1196.84.camel@jiro |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2002-03-20 at 10:24, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > AFAICT it shouldn't be too difficult. However, there is a note in the
> > TODO list referring to breaking backwards compatability with the
> > "pgNotify API". Exactly how backwards compatible do we need to be?
>
> imho not much in this case (though of course we may find a way to be
> very compatible when someone actually implements it). I had found the
> equivalent feature very useful when building a large data handling
> system a few years ago, and I'd think that it would be useful in
> PostgreSQL also.
Okay, I'll implement this.
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilconway(at)rogers(dot)com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Blood | 2002-03-20 17:24:51 | Re: pgmonitor |
| Previous Message | Vincent Stoessel | 2002-03-20 17:00:39 | bug/feature with upper function? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-03-20 17:15:19 | Re: [HACKERS] Fixes gram.y |
| Previous Message | Vince Vielhaber | 2002-03-20 16:56:08 | Re: XML |