Re: SQL Server performing much better?!?!

From: Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SQL Server performing much better?!?!
Date: 2002-03-20 07:05:30
Message-ID: 1016607930.1196.78.camel@jiro
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, 2002-03-20 at 01:50, Christian Cabanero wrote:
> Good point, here's the info I should've also provided:
> [snip]

I don't think many people on the list are MS SQL experts -- IMO, the
best we can do is concentrate on improving PostgreSQL performance.

To that end, can you tell us:

(1) the query that is slow in Postgres but fast in MS SQL

(2) the definition of any tables, indexes, views, etc used by the query
in #1.

(3) the output of EXPLAIN for the query in #1.

Also, have you run VACUUM ANALYZE?

Cheers,

Neil

--
Neil Conway <neilconway(at)rogers(dot)com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message TPCCUVA 2002-03-20 10:22:27 CHECKPOINTS
Previous Message Christian Cabanero 2002-03-20 06:50:38 Re: SQL Server performing much better?!?!