| From: | Neil Padgett <npadgett(at)redhat(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kumar Khare <skamit2000(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, param_inder(at)yahoo(dot)com, kharebm(at)yahoo(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Implementation Proposal For Add Free Behind |
| Date: | 2002-02-25 21:43:30 |
| Message-ID: | 1014673410.26119.4.camel@totally-bodacious |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 2002-02-23 at 08:30, Amit Kumar Khare wrote:
> Considering thesesuggestions as our baseline we have decided to
implement Most Recently Used(MRU) cache replacement policy. Our task
will be to identify a large sequentialscan and then advice the buffer
manager to apply MRU for cache replacement.
This could lead to poor buffer performance in the case of multiple
backends simultaneously executing queries. How will you handle this?
Neil
--
Neil Padgett
Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: npadgett(at)redhat(dot)com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300,
Toronto, ON M4P 2C9
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-02-25 22:59:02 | Re: Defunct postmasters |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-02-25 21:40:10 | Re: More time zones |