Re: querying the version of libpq

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: querying the version of libpq
Date: 2010-10-05 21:00:20
Message-ID: 1013.1286312420@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

"Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> writes:
>> The real problem is that neither of these can be trusted to tell you the
>> *library* version. PQserverVersion() is something else altogether,
>> and I wouldn't want to assume that pg_config exactly matches the library
>> you're linked to --- if it's even present at all.

> Er...yes it will match exact...because we[1] get the location of the
> library files from pg_config as well. :) Handy little utility that.

[ shrug... ] It's not at all hard to think of scenarios where that will
give you misleading results, even granted that you're willing to fall
over when pg_config isn't present. But regardless of that, the
technique simply isn't available to ordinary C code using the standard
dynamic linker.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tim Uckun 2010-10-05 21:06:11 Re: Trying to figure out why these queries are so slow
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2010-10-05 20:53:03 Re: querying the version of libpq

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2010-10-05 21:05:43 Re: knngist - 0.8
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2010-10-05 20:59:18 Re: leaky views, yet again