| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jan Wieck <jan(at)wi3ck(dot)info> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Robins Tharakan <tharakan(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects |
| Date: | 2021-03-23 20:55:50 |
| Message-ID: | 1010642.1616532950@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jan Wieck <jan(at)wi3ck(dot)info> writes:
> Have we even reached a consensus yet on that doing it the way, my patch
> is proposing, is the right way to go? Like that emitting BLOB TOC
> entries into SECTION_DATA when in binary upgrade mode is a good thing?
> Or that bunching all the SQL statements for creating the blob, changing
> the ACL and COMMENT and SECLABEL all in one multi-statement-query is.
Now you're asking for actual review effort, which is a little hard
to come by towards the tail end of the last CF of a cycle. I'm
interested in this topic, but I can't justify spending much time
on it right now.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-03-23 20:59:57 | Re: Nicer error when connecting to standby with hot_standby=off |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-03-23 20:52:01 | Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch |