Re: [RFC] new digest datatypes, or generic fixed-len hex types?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] new digest datatypes, or generic fixed-len hex types?
Date: 2009-07-27 14:20:18
Message-ID: 10105.1248704418@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> We've developed some code to implement fixed-length datatypes for well
> known digest function output (MD5, SHA1 and the various SHA2 types).
> These types have minimal overhead and are quite complete, including
> btree and hash opclasses.

> We're wondering about proposing them for inclusion in pgcrypto.

Wasn't this proposed and rejected before? (Or more to the point,
why'd you bother? The advantage over bytea seems negligible.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-07-27 15:09:28 Re: Review: support for multiplexing SIGUSR1
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-07-27 14:14:52 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Reserve the shared memory region during backend startup on