Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 16:15, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Also, if you really do need to figure out which PG headers you're
>> compiling against, looking at catversion.h is the accepted way to do it.
>> There's no need for yet another symbol.
> This file is, AFAIK, not included with client installs? It's
> definitely not present in the libpq-dev package on debian. It's a
> backend development file, no?
[ shrug... ] We can't be held responsible for stupid packaging
decisions by distros.
regards, tom lane