Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg(at)bec(dot)de>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)
Date: 2019-01-08 00:37:51
Message-ID: 10068.1546907871@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> Hm, shouldn't we extract the perfect hash generation into a perl module
> or such? It seems that there's plenty other possible uses for it.

Such as? But in any case, that sounds like a task for someone with
more sense of Perl style than I have.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2019-01-08 00:52:58 Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-01-08 00:36:58 Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)