Re: segfault of autovacuum process during restore - coredumps included

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Frank van Vugt <ftm(dot)van(dot)vugt(at)foxi(dot)nl>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: segfault of autovacuum process during restore - coredumps included
Date: 2005-11-28 15:20:57
Message-ID: 10036.1133191257@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Frank van Vugt <ftm(dot)van(dot)vugt(at)foxi(dot)nl> writes:
> Tom, is your patch meant for the exact same location?

No. There are two StartTransactionCommand calls in autovacuum.c, and
what I'm suggesting is to add the ActiveSnapshot assignment after each
one.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stefano Reksten 2005-11-28 16:49:02 Bug on CHARACTER(n) ?
Previous Message Frank van Vugt 2005-11-28 15:12:53 Re: segfault of autovacuum process during restore - coredumps included