Re: Built-in connection pooler

From: Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, "ideriha(dot)takeshi(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <ideriha(dot)takeshi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(dot)casanova(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ryan Lambert <ryan(at)rustprooflabs(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Dimitri Fontaine <dim(at)tapoueh(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Built-in connection pooler
Date: 2020-09-17 08:40:59
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 17.09.2020 8:07, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 06:38:02PM +0300, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote:
>> Sorry, correct patch is attached.
> This needs again a rebase, and has been waiting on author for 6 weeks
> now, so I am switching it to RwF.
> --
> Michael

Attached is rebased version of the patch.

I wonder what is the correct policy of handling patch status?
This patch was marked as WfA 2020-07-01 because it was not applied any more.
2020-07-02 I have sent rebased version of the patch.
Since this time there was not unanswered questions.
So I actually didn't consider that some extra activity from my side is need.
I have not noticed that patch is not applied any more.
And now it is marked as returned with feedback.

So my questions are:
1. Should I myself change status from WfA to some other?
2. Is there some way to receive notifications that patch is not applied
any more?

I can resubmit this patch to the next commitfest if it is still
interesting for community.

Konstantin Knizhnik
Postgres Professional:
The Russian Postgres Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
builtin_connection_proxy-28.patch text/x-patch 136.2 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2020-09-17 08:41:54 pgbench calculates summary numbers a wrong way.
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2020-09-17 08:38:47 Re: Yet another fast GiST build