Re: createuser --memeber and PG 16

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: createuser --memeber and PG 16
Date: 2023-05-22 06:42:28
Message-ID: 0e85c9e7-4804-1cdb-5a4a-c72c328f9ad8@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 21.05.23 19:07, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> How do folks feel about keeping --role undocumented? Should we give it a
> mention in the docs for --member-of?

We made a point in this release to document deprecated options
consistently. See commit 2f80c95740.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2023-05-22 06:51:31 Re: Avoiding another needless ERROR during nbtree page deletion
Previous Message shveta malik 2023-05-22 05:56:48 Re: Support logical replication of DDLs