From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Improve new hash partition bound check error messages |
Date: | 2021-02-22 07:09:46 |
Message-ID: | 0e685d51-d214-3dde-8e78-23edfec055dc@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 15.02.21 17:45, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2021-02-03 15:52, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 2021-02-02 13:26, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>>> How about this?
>>>
>>> CREATE TABLE fail_part PARTITION OF hash_parted FOR VALUES WITH (MODULUS
>>> 25, REMAINDER 3);
>>> ERROR: every hash partition modulus must be a factor of the next larger
>>> modulus
>>> DETAIL: 25 is not divisible by 10, the modulus of existing partition
>>> "hpart_1"
>>
>> I don't know if we can easily get the name of the existing partition.
>> I'll have to check that.
>>
>> I'm worried that this phrasing requires the user to understand that
>> "divisible by" is related to "factor of", which is of course correct but
>> introduces yet more complexity into this.
>>
>> I'll play around with this a bit more.
>
> Here is a new patch that implements the suggestions.
committed
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2021-02-22 07:25:28 | RE: Parallel INSERT (INTO ... SELECT ...) |
Previous Message | miyake_kouta | 2021-02-22 07:04:10 | [PATCH] Feature improvement for TRUNCATE tab completion. |