Re: [doc] plan invalidation when statistics are update

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: torikoshia <torikoshia(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [doc] plan invalidation when statistics are update
Date: 2020-11-24 14:14:57
Message-ID: 0e55d428-9156-8ea0-a480-03d4bd3b3277@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020/11/19 14:33, torikoshia wrote:
> On 2020-11-18 11:35, Fujii Masao wrote:
>
> Thanks for your comment!
>
>> On 2020/11/18 11:04, torikoshia wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> AFAIU, when the planner statistics are updated, generic plans are invalidated and PostgreSQL recreates. However, the manual doesn't seem to explain it explicitly.
>>>
>>>    https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/sql-prepare.html
>>>
>>> I guess this case is included in 'whenever database objects used in the statement have definitional (DDL) changes undergone', but I feel it's hard to infer.
>>>
>>> Since updates of the statistics can often happen, how about describing this case explicitly like an attached patch?
>>
>> +1 to add that note.
>>
>> -   statement.  Also, if the value of <xref linkend="guc-search-path"/> changes
>> +   statement. For example, when the planner statistics of the statement
>> +   are updated, <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> re-analyzes and
>> +   re-plans the statement.
>>
>> I don't think "For example," is necessary.
>>
>> "planner statistics of the statement" sounds vague? Does the statement
>> is re-analyzed and re-planned only when the planner statistics of database
>> objects used in the statement are updated? If yes, we should describe
>> that to make the note a bit more explicitly?
>
> Yes. As far as I confirmed, updating statistics which are not used in
> prepared statements doesn't trigger re-analyze and re-plan.
>
> Since plan invalidations for DDL changes and statistcal changes are caused
> by PlanCacheRelCallback(Oid 'relid'), only the prepared statements using
> 'relid' relation seem invalidated.>
> Attached updated patch.

Thanks for confirming that and updating the patch!
Barring any objection, I will commit the patch.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-11-24 15:01:53 Re: LogwrtResult contended spinlock
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2020-11-24 14:12:19 Re: Prevent printing "next step instructions" in initdb and pg_upgrade