Re: Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, "Shinoda, Noriyoshi" <noriyoshi(dot)shinoda(at)hpe(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT
Date: 2017-08-02 01:53:48
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017/08/02 9:31, Amit Langote wrote:
> On 2017/08/02 4:02, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 12:26 AM, Amit Langote
>> <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>>> So is the latest patch posted upthread to process ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING
>>> using locally-defined unique indexes on leaf partitions something to consider?
>> Yeah, for v11.
> OK.

Will stick this into the next CF.


In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2017-08-02 02:01:15 Re: VACUUM and ANALYZE disagreeing on what reltuples means
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2017-08-02 01:49:50 pgbench: Skipping the creating primary keys after initialization