Re: Upgrading the backend's error-message infrastructure

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Upgrading the backend's error-message infrastructure
Date: 2003-03-14 02:18:48
Message-ID: 0d1b01c2e9d0$0d265300$6500a8c0@fhp.internal
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces

> Great work, Tom!
>
> While we're effectively changing every elog call site in the backend,
> would it also be a good idea to adopt a standard for the format of error
> messages? (e.g. capitalization, grammar, etc.)

I 100% agree with this - a style guide!

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-03-14 02:32:36 Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-03-14 02:16:42 Re: Upgrading the backend's error-message infrastructure

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-03-14 02:32:36 Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-03-14 02:16:42 Re: Upgrading the backend's error-message infrastructure