Re: Proposal for internal Numeric to Uint64 conversion function.

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal for internal Numeric to Uint64 conversion function.
Date: 2022-05-02 14:53:34
Message-ID: 0d0dd4ec-d446-f4f2-ab5a-7e999f0a468c@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 22.04.22 14:26, Amul Sul wrote:
> Yes, I think we can do cleanup to some extent. Attaching the
> following patches that first intend to remove DirectFunctionCall as
> much as possible:

Do you have any data that supports removing DirectionFunctionCall()
invocations? I suppose some performance benefit could be expected, or
what do you have in mind?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-05-02 14:54:45 Re: Configuration Parameter/GUC value validation hook
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-05-02 14:48:52 Re: Refactor construct_array() and deconstruct_array() for built-in types