Re: [PG13] Planning (time + buffers) data structure in explain plan (format text)

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Pierre Giraud <pierre(dot)giraud(at)dalibo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Fujii Masao <fujii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PG13] Planning (time + buffers) data structure in explain plan (format text)
Date: 2020-08-20 15:41:34
Message-ID: 0d074a53-fd91-b1dd-a529-173d07627465@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020/08/20 22:34, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 12:29 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 at 19:58, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2020/08/20 13:00, David Rowley wrote:
>>>> I forgot to mention earlier, you'll also need to remove the part in
>>>> the docs that mentions BUFFERS requires ANALYZE.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the review! I removed that.
>>> Attached is the updated version of the patch.
>>> I also added the regression test performing "explain (buffers on)"
>>> without "analyze" option.
>>
>> Looks good to me.
>
> Looks good to me too.

David and Julien, thanks for the review! I'd like to wait for
Pierre's opinion about this change before committing the patch.

Pierre,
could you share your opinion about this change?

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-08-20 16:58:32 ReplicationSlotsComputeRequiredXmin seems pretty questionable
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2020-08-20 15:36:40 Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers, take 2