Re: DDL result is lost by CREATE DATABASE with WAL_LOG strategy

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "Ryo Matsumura (Fujitsu)" <matsumura(dot)ryo(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DDL result is lost by CREATE DATABASE with WAL_LOG strategy
Date: 2023-02-17 14:13:32
Message-ID: 0d004eac-9d94-0a81-cad3-20d9c4847d71@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 16.02.23 22:29, Andres Freund wrote:
> What's the story behind 100_bugs.pl? This name clearly is copied from
> src/test/subscription/t/100_bugs.pl - but I've never understood why that is
> outside of the normal numbering space.

Mainly to avoid awkwardness for backpatching. The number of tests in
src/test/subscription/ varies quite a bit across branches.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-02-17 15:09:35 Re: The output sql generated by pg_dump for a create function refers to a modified table name
Previous Message Drouvot, Bertrand 2023-02-17 14:13:17 Re: Change xl_hash_vacuum_one_page.ntuples from int to uint16