Re: Inconsistent trigger behavior between two temporal leftovers

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Sergei Patiakin <sergei(dot)patiakin(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "Paul A(dot) Jungwirth" <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Inconsistent trigger behavior between two temporal leftovers
Date: 2026-04-27 09:40:15
Message-ID: 0c878aee-76a4-44ac-80e9-1b6e21d68402@eisentraut.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 08.04.26 14:50, Sergei Patiakin wrote:
> Attaching a patch that makes the behavior more consistent.

Maybe this is not a problem in your patch, but I'm confused under what
circumstances one is supposed to use the return value of
execute_attr_map_slot(). Existing code appears to be inconsistent about
that, but there isn't any explanation anywhere I can see.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message shveta malik 2026-04-27 09:48:23 Re: [Patch]: Fix excessive ProcArrayLock acquisitions with subscription max_retention_duration=0
Previous Message shveta malik 2026-04-27 09:38:06 Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication