| From: | "Michael Paesold" <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum loose ends |
| Date: | 2005-08-01 07:55:11 |
| Message-ID: | 0bea01c5966e$58cd5db0$d501a8c0@zaphod |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Here is another patch for autovacuum:
...
> - Xid-wraparound VACUUM is now FULL without ANALYZE
Am I right in my assumption that this VACUUM FULL can happen for any
database, not just a template database?
I think this is a bad idea. Vacuum full is not an option for our and many
other production databases. I suggest that should be a plain VACUUM.
Otherwise I think you have done great job finally integrating auto vacuum
into the backend.
Best Regards,
Michael Paesold
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2005-08-01 08:17:21 | Re: Remote administration functionality |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2005-08-01 07:41:19 | Re: Remote administration functionality |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2005-08-01 08:46:26 | Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-08-01 02:26:27 | Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch |