From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers mailing list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Sergey Prokhorenko <sergeyprokhorenko(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)au>, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Przemysław Sztoch <przemyslaw(at)sztoch(dot)pl>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mat Arye <mat(at)timescaledb(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: UUID v7 |
Date: | 2024-03-19 08:55:51 |
Message-ID: | 0b1b5e91-177e-4362-8caf-d227d5a1ae3c@eisentraut.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 16.03.24 18:43, Andrey M. Borodin wrote:
>> On 15 Mar 2024, at 14:47, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> +1 to the idea. I doubt that anyone will miss it.
>
> PFA v22.
>
> Changes:
> 1. Squashed all editorialisation by Jelte
> 2. Fixed my erroneous comments on using Method 2 (we are using method 1 instead)
> 3. Remove all traces of uuid_extract_variant()
I have committed a subset of this for now, namely the additions of
uuid_extract_timestamp() and uuid_extract_version(). These seemed
mature and agreed upon. You can rebase the rest of your patch on top of
that.
I have started a separate discussion to learn about the precision we can
expect from gettimeofday().
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fabrice Chapuis | 2024-03-19 08:58:20 | hot updates and fillfactor |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2024-03-19 08:28:37 | What is a typical precision of gettimeofday()? |