Re: Docs on BOOTSTRAP relations

From: "Rod Taylor" <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>
To: <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Docs on BOOTSTRAP relations
Date: 2002-03-09 02:38:39
Message-ID: 0b0e01c1c713$cc076fb0$b002000a@jester
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Hmm.. ignore this patch. It just doesn't sound right. Something else
has to be going on...

--
Rod Taylor

This message represents the official view of the voices in my head

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rod Taylor" <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>
To: <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 9:15 PM
Subject: [PATCHES] Docs on BOOTSTRAP relations

> Cleaned up the README somewhat. Removed a useless statement which
was
> even marked as outdated (if someone really wants the old one, have
> them dig through CVS).
>
> Also added a note that in order for a BOOTSTRAP table to be created,
> it is required to have data in it. You wouldn't believe the number
of
> other changes I made before that one. Fiddled with OID ranges,
order
> of the creation among other things.
>
> Also made a note of the order of the header files in the
> POSTGRES_BKI_SRCS line.
>
>
> --
> Rod Taylor
>
> Your eyes are weary from staring at the CRT. You feel sleepy. Notice
> how restful it is to watch the cursor blink. Close your eyes. The
> opinions stated above are yours. You cannot imagine why you ever
felt
> otherwise.
>
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------

>
> ---------------------------(end of
broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2002-03-09 02:52:29 Re: Docs on BOOTSTRAP relations
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2002-03-09 02:15:12 Docs on BOOTSTRAP relations