From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | a(dot)mitrokhin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru, Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Starting a PostgreSQL server on a dynamic port (parameter port=0) |
Date: | 2025-07-10 08:53:17 |
Message-ID: | 0ae1aa4b0e3343e2bd2c1b7c41ebeccfe0f65188.camel@cybertec.at |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu, 2025-07-10 at 15:29 +0700, a(dot)mitrokhin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru wrote:
> > > Postgres does not allow starting the server with port=0, which prevents
> > > it from obtaining an arbitrary free port from the kernel.
>
> This has nothing to do with Postgres regression tests. The issue is
> the practical benefit of using a dynamic port, which we're depriving
> ourselves of.
>
> If you're not interested in this behavior, you'll never use it. But
> there are cases where it can be very convenient. Why artificially
> restrict functionality that is simple, doesn't conflict with anything,
> and has no negative side effects?
I have never wished for such a feature, and I can see negative side
effects. If the server listens on a different port than you expect,
it is easier to connect to the wrong server by mistake.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim Jones | 2025-07-10 09:13:31 | Re: Starting a PostgreSQL server on a dynamic port (parameter port=0) |
Previous Message | a.mitrokhin | 2025-07-10 08:29:53 | Re: Starting a PostgreSQL server on a dynamic port (parameter port=0) |