Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog
Date: 2016-08-26 15:53:21
Message-ID: 0a089d6a-ff1d-88b0-5966-44bbbe5aa202@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 8/25/16 10:39 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I am relaunching $subject as 10 development will begin soon. As far as
> I know, there is agreement that we can do something here. Among the
> different proposals I have found:
> - pg_clog renamed to pg_commit_status, pg_xact or pg_commit
> - pg_xlog renamed to pg_xjournal, pg_wal or pg_journal

If we're going to do some renaming, then I suggest we do a
mini-file-system structure under $PGDATA, like

$PGDATA/etc
$PGDATA/log
$PGDATA/run (lock files etc.)
$PGDATA/tmp
$PGDATA/var

The names of all the things under "var" could still be refined, but it's
much less likely that users will confuse data with configuration or
plain logs under that scheme.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2016-08-26 15:56:19 Re: WAL consistency check facility
Previous Message Yury Zhuravlev 2016-08-26 15:46:42 Re: Why is a newly created index contains the invalid LSN?