Re: requested shared memory size overflows size_t

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Yuri Levinsky <yuril(at)celltick(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: requested shared memory size overflows size_t
Date: 2014-03-16 14:31:06
Message-ID: 0MYHO0-1WcPVq1juq-00UneI@mrelayeu.kundenserver.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 16 Mar 2014 22:06, Yuri Levinsky <yuril(at)celltick(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Craig,
> Is this output correct now?
> #define SIZEOF_OFF_T 8
> #define SIZEOF_VOID_P 8

Well, you are getting 64-bit pointers. So if you are trying to produce a 64-bit executable then yes, this looks appropriate.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2014-03-16 14:32:48 Re: jsonb status - 'JsonbValue' has no member named 'size'
Previous Message MauMau 2014-03-16 14:23:26 Re: [RFC] What should we do for reliable WAL archiving?