| From: | John DeSoi <desoi(at)pgedit(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: Per-function search_path => per-function GUC settings | 
| Date: | 2007-09-01 19:56:29 | 
| Message-ID: | 0FDD47E1-D9F7-4479-B829-32947EBC7DB4@pgedit.com | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
On Sep 1, 2007, at 1:36 PM, Brendan Jurd wrote:
> So if we integrated the GUC settings into CREATE FUNCTION, we'd end up
> writing something like
>
> CREATE FUNCTION foo(int) RETURNS int AS $$
> ...
> $$
>  LANGUAGE plpgsql
>  STABLE
>  STRICT
>  SECURITY DEFINER
>  RESET search_path
>  SET regex_flavor = 'cinnamon';
>
> That doesn't seem especially horrible.  In what way do you feel it is
> inconsistent with existing syntax?
I like this and would really like to see way to set everything using  
CREATE FUNCTION. Using ALTER only requires maintaining a separate  
copy of of function arguments which can be a hassle for large  
argument lists.
John DeSoi, Ph.D.
http://pgedit.com/
Power Tools for PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Florian G. Pflug | 2007-09-01 21:13:08 | Re: [PATCH] Lazy xid assingment V2 | 
| Previous Message | Florian G. Pflug | 2007-09-01 19:52:55 | Re: [PATCH] Lazy xid assingment V2 |