| From: | John DeSoi <desoi(at)pgedit(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Per-function search_path => per-function GUC settings |
| Date: | 2007-09-01 19:56:29 |
| Message-ID: | 0FDD47E1-D9F7-4479-B829-32947EBC7DB4@pgedit.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sep 1, 2007, at 1:36 PM, Brendan Jurd wrote:
> So if we integrated the GUC settings into CREATE FUNCTION, we'd end up
> writing something like
>
> CREATE FUNCTION foo(int) RETURNS int AS $$
> ...
> $$
> LANGUAGE plpgsql
> STABLE
> STRICT
> SECURITY DEFINER
> RESET search_path
> SET regex_flavor = 'cinnamon';
>
> That doesn't seem especially horrible. In what way do you feel it is
> inconsistent with existing syntax?
I like this and would really like to see way to set everything using
CREATE FUNCTION. Using ALTER only requires maintaining a separate
copy of of function arguments which can be a hassle for large
argument lists.
John DeSoi, Ph.D.
http://pgedit.com/
Power Tools for PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Florian G. Pflug | 2007-09-01 21:13:08 | Re: [PATCH] Lazy xid assingment V2 |
| Previous Message | Florian G. Pflug | 2007-09-01 19:52:55 | Re: [PATCH] Lazy xid assingment V2 |